• header Image

Introduction to Comparative Politics

Home/ Introduction To Comparative Politics
Course Type Course Code No. Of Credits
Discipline Core NA 4

Course coordinator and team : Ekta Singh

Course Details:

  1. Summary

The course is a Discipline Specific Core (DSC) for BA in Social Sciences (4th semester) students. It introduces students to the field of comparative politics by familiarizing them with comparative methods and the interplay between formal and informal governance mechanisms. The course sheds light on the variability that characterizes the modern state in different settings, particularly the postcolonial setting and new citizenship claims. The diverse nature of political regimes and transitions will be focused upon. Contemporary forms of political mobilization such as populism will be discussed to enable students to make sense of the contemporary.

 

 

  1. Objectives:

The overall objective of this course is to:

 

    1. Introduce students to the basic concepts, principles, and methods of comparative politics

 

    1. To familiarize students with the wide range of political institutions and the cultural context to be able to better appreciate and understand their own context.
    2. To enable them to analyze contemporary political issues within the broader comparative field
    3. To help students understand the contemporary better by understanding the interplay of political structure and political culture
  1. Learning Outcomes: At the end of this course, students are expected to
  • to be able to comprehend the methods and relevance of comparative framework
  • to be able to locate and contextualize political developments and institutions within the larger comparative framework
  • to be able to discern broader trends and trajectories cross-nationally and the factors underpinning them
  • to have a more informed understanding of the contemporary.
  1. Overall structure: This course is divided into five modules, and course delivery timeline is tabulated below:

 

Srl.

No.

Name of the Module

Number of weeks

1.

Understanding Comparative Politics

2 weeks

2.

The State in a Comparative Framework

2 weeks

3.

Comparative Political Institutions

3 weeks

4.

Political Regimes and Transitions

2 weeks

5.

Political Mobilization: State and Non-State

3 weeks

Essential Readings:

  • Lijphart, Arend (1971). "Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method". American Political Science Review 65 (3): 682–693.
  • Hague, Rod & Martin Harrop. (2013). Comparative Government and Politics - An Introduction. (9th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan [Chapter- “The Comparative Approach”].
  • Chilcote, H Ronald. (1989). 'Alternative Approaches to Comparative Politics' in Howard J.Wiarda (ed.), New Directions in Comparative Politics, Westview Press, Boulder and London.
  • Chandhoke, Neera (1996), “The Limits of Comparative Political Analysis”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 31, No. 4, January 27, pp. PE2-PE8.
  • Apter, David E. “Comparative Politics, Old and New” in Robert E. Goodin and Hans Klingeman.eds. (1996). A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Chilcote, Ronald H. (1994). Theories of Comparative Politics: The search for a Paradigm Reconsidered, Oxford: Westview Press.
  • Chilcote,  Ronald  H.  (2000).  “Institutional  Frameworks:  State  and  System”,

Comparative Inquiry in Politics and Political Economy, Westview Press.

  • Barkey, Karen and Sunita Parikh (1991). “Comparative Perspectives on the State”,

Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 17.

  • Hague et al. (2004). Comparative Government and Politics, Palgrave Macmillan. [Chapter- “The State in a global context”].
  • Levy, Jonah d. (2015). “State Transformations in Comparative Perspective” in Leibfried, Stephan, and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, Oxford Academic.
  • Chowdhury, Sujit (2013). ‘How to Do Comparative Constitutional Law in India’ in Khilnani, Sunil, Vikram Raghavan, and Arun K. Thiruvengadam (eds), Comparative Constitutionalism in South Asia, Oxford Academic.
  • Edward Weisband, Courtney I P Thomas (2015). “Colonialist and Postcolonial Political Culture” in Political Culture and the Making of Modern Nation-States, Routledge.
  • Jeff Haynes (2003). “Tracing connections between comparative politics and globalization”, Third World Quarterly, 24:6, 1029-1047.
  • Lange, Matthew (2015). “States in the Global South: Transformations, Trends, Diversity” in The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State.
  • Vink, Maarten (2017). ‘Comparing Citizenship Regimes’ in Shachar, Ayelet, and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, Oxford Academic.
  • Chung, Erin Aeran (2017). ‘Citizenship in Non-Western contexts’ in Shachar, Ayelet, and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, Oxford Academic.
  • Pateman, Carole (1971). “Political Culture, Political Structure, and Political Change”,

British Journal of Political Science, Vol.1, No.3.

  • Easton, D., Tawney, R.H., Weiner, M., Lipsitz, L. (1970). ‘Political Culture and Political Systems’. in Understanding Society. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15392-3_27
  • Douglas V. Verney, The Analysis of Political Systems, the Free Press of Glencoe, Inc. New York, 1959.
  • Hague,  R.,  Harrop,  (2004).  -  “Constitutions  and  the  Legal  framework”,  in

Comparative Government and Politics. Palgrave, London.

  • Hague, R., Harrop, (2004). “Political Executive”, in Comparative Government and Politics. Palgrave, London.
  • Hague, R., Harrop, (2004). “Federal, Unitary and Local Government” in Comparative Government and Politics. Palgrave, London.
  • Linz, Juan (1994). “Presidential or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference?” In The failure of presidential democracy: Comparative perspectives. Vol. 1, edited by Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela: Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Duchacek, I.D. Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics, Holt, Rinechart and Winston., New York, 1970
  • Heywood, Andrew (2019). Politics, Red Globe Press. [Chapter 5- “Regimes of the Modern World”]
  • Alan Siaroff (2013). Comparing Political Regimes: A Thematic Introduction to Comparative Politics, University of Toronto Press. [Select Chapters]
  • Lim, Timothy (2016). – “What makes a Democracy: Explaining the Breakdown of Authoritarian Rule” in Doing Comparative Politics: An Introduction to Approaches and Issues, Lynn Rienner.
  • Gandhi, J. (2008). “The World of Dictatorial Institutions” in Political institutions under dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Inglehart, Ronald and Christian Welzel (2003). “Political Culture and Democracy”,

Comparative Politics, Vol.36, No.1.

  • Collier D, Levitsky S. (1997). “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research”, World Politics. 49(3):430-451.
  • Boix, Carles, and Susan C. Stokes (eds) (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, Oxford Academic. [Chapter-15 ‘Democracy and Civic Culture’ and Chapter-16 ‘’Dictatorship: Analytical Approaches’].
  • Heywood, Andrew (2019). “Parties and Party Systems” in Politics, Red Globe Press.
  • Heywood, Andrew (2019). “Representation, Elections, and Voting” in Politics, Red Globe Press.
  • Morse, Jordan et.al (2013). “Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics during Elections”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, Issue 2.

 

  • Urbinati, Nadia (2019). “Political Theory of Populism”, Annual Review of Political Science, 22: 111-127.
  • Moffitt, Benjamin (2016). “The Stage I: Populism and the Media”, in The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation, Stanford University Press.
  • Hague and Harrop (2004). “Political Participation”, Comparative Government and Politics,

Pedagogy:

  1. Instructional design: Classroom teaching.
  2. Special needs (facilities, requirements in terms of software, studio, lab, clinic, library, classroom/others instructional space; any other – please specify): Not required.
  3. Expertise in AUD faculty or outside: This course will be offered by AUD faculty.
  4. Linkages with external agencies (e.g., with field-based organizations, hospital; any others): Not required.

Assessment structure (modes and frequency of assessments): There will be two assessments of 50% each.

  • Assessment 1 (50%): Write-up and Presentation analyzing any contemporary political issue through comparative lens
    • Write-Up: 30%
    • Presentation: 20%
  • Assessment 2 (50%): In-class Exam based on selected readings of the course

 

Top